The Shakespeare Mask written by Newton Frohlich

shakespeare mask

Guest post by MJW

0 stars

In spite of the extensive peppering of PhDs amongst the collaborators thanked in  Acknowledgements  no one thought to proof read Mr Newton Frohlich’s material.

He does not know the difference between step and half sisters – Mary Tudor and Elizabeth I were Half sisters. He uses step sisters throughout. both to describe these two monarchs but then makes the same error describing other families’ members’ relationships later on.

He does not understand the use of the term ‘the Queen’ when Elizabeth I is speaking or being described versus the queen – a generic term. This is basic stuff.

He quotes Elizabeth’s motto as being Semper Diadem – it is in fact Semper Eadem. Just because she might wear a diadem doesn’t mean it works as a Latin motto for a monarch.

He does not understand how an Earl and his pedigree is described. The hero of this novel is the 17th Earl of Oxford. That delineates this family as having long aristocratic descent. This man has a son and heir known as the 18th Earl of Oxford. In this narrative he is known as Oxford Eighteen. This is so simply crass.

The novel which prides itself on being located within a specific historical setting is full of sloppy factual errors like these.

In addition the anachronistic dialogue is cringe provoking. He refers regularly to drinking ‘warm beer’ – I don’t think anyone had iced lagers in 16th century England.

One doesn’t have to have characters saying Forsooth or Prithee but no noblemen of that time would speak like people from NCIS or the like. We can’t do shit about this etc

A lawyer by training, the author has espoused the cause of those who cannot accept that a glove maker’s son from Stratford could have written the 37 plays attributed to him.  His attempt to engage with this debate via a novelisation of the life of the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward De Vere makes poor comparison with the film Anonymous, written by John Orloff, directed by Roland Emmerich which covers EXACTLY the same material.

Having read this weak, embarrassingly awkward novel it makes one realise just how talented Hilary Mantel is.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s